Tuesday, 30 November 2010

A reflection of what happend and what's happening in our world

American Indian, Chief Seattle letter


American Indian, Chief Seattle, wrote to President Franklin Pierce in 1854.
.

How can you buy or sell the sky, the warmth of the land? The idea is strange to us. If we do not own the freshness of the air and the sparkle of the water, how can you buy them?

Every part of this earth is sacred to my people. Every shining pine needle, every sandy shore, every mist in the dark woods, every clearing and humming insect is holy in the memory and experience of my people. The sap which courses through the trees carries the memories of the red man.

The white man's dead forget the country of their birth when they go to walk among the stars. Our dead never forget this beautiful earth, for it is the mother of the red man. We are part of the earth and it is a part of us. The perfumed flowers are our sisters; the deer, the horse, the great eagle, these are our brothers. The rocky crests, the juices in the meadows, the body heat of the pony, and man--all belong to the same family.

So, when the Great Chief in Washington sends word that he wishes to buy our land, he asks much of us. The Great Chief sends word he will reserve us a place so that we can live comfortably to ourselves. He will be our father and we will be his children. So we will consider your offer to buy our land. But it will not be easy. For this land is sacred to us.

This shining water that moves in the streams and rivers is not just water but the blood of our ancestors. If we sell you land, you must remember that it is sacred, and you must teach your children that it is sacred and that each ghastly reflection in the clear water of the lake tells of events and memories in the life of my people. The water's murmur is the voice of my father's father.

The rivers are our brothers, they quench our thirst. The rivers carry our canoes, and feed our children. If we sell you our land, you must remember, and teach your children that the rivers are our brothers, and yours, and you must henceforth give the rivers the kindness you would give any brother.

We know that the white man does not understand our ways. One portion of land is the same to him as the next, for he is a stranger who comes in the night and takes from the land whatever he needs. The earth is not his brother but his enemy, and when he has conquered it, he moves on. He leaves his fathers' graves and his children's birthright is forgotten. He treats his mother, the earth, and his brother, the sky, as things to be bought, plundered, sold like sheep or bright beads. His appetite will devour the earth and leave behind only a desert.

I do not know. Our ways are different from your ways. The sight of your cities pains the eyes of the red man. But perhaps it is because the red man is a savage and does not understand.

There is no quiet place in the white man's cities. No place to hear the unfurling of leaves in spring, or the rustle of an insect's wings. But perhaps it is because I am a savage and do not understand. The clatter only seems to insult the ears. And what is there to life if a man cannot hear the lonely cry of the whippoorwill or the arguments of the frogs around a pond at night? I am a red man and do not understand. The Indian prefers the soft sound of the wind darting over the face of a pond, and the smell of the wind itself, cleansed by rain or scented with the pine cone.

The air is precious to the red man, for all things share the same breath: the beast, the tree, the man, they all share the same breath. The white men, they all share the same breath. The white man does not seem to notice the air he breathes. Like a man dying for many days, he is numb to the stench. But if we sell you our land, you must remember that the air is precious to us, that the air gave our grandfather his first breath also received his last sigh. And if we sell you our land, you must keep it apart and sacred, as a place where even the white man can go to taste the wind that is sweetened by the meadow's flowers.
So we will consider your offer to buy our land. If we decide to accept I will make one condition. The white man must treat the beasts of this land as his brothers.

I am savage and I do not understand any other way. I have seen a thousand rotting buffaloes on the prairie, left by the white man who shot them from a passing train. I am a savage and I do not understand how the smoking iron horse can be more important that the buffalo that we kill only to stay alive.

What is man without the beasts? If all the beasts were gone, man would die from a great loneliness of spirit. For whatever happens to the beasts, soon happens to man. All things are connected.

You must teach your children that the ground beneath their feet is the ashes of our grandfathers. So that they will respect the land, tell your children that the earth is rich with the lives of our kin. Teach your children what we have taught our children, that the earth is our mother. Whatever befalls the earth befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.

Even the white man, whose God walks and talks with him as friend to friend, cannot be exempt from the common destiny. We may be brothers after all. We shall see. One thing we know, which the white man may one day discover---our God is the same God. You may think now that you own Him as you wish to own our land; but you cannot. He is the God of man and his compassion is equal for the red man and the white. The earth is precious to him, and to harm the earth is to heap contempt upon its Creator. The Whites, too, shall pass; perhaps sooner than all other tribes. Contaminate your bed and you will one night suffocate in your own waste.

But in your perishing, you will shine brightly, fired by the strength of the God who brought you to this land and for some special purpose gave you dominion over this land and over the red man. That destiny is a mystery to us, for we do not understand when the buffalo are all slaughtered, the wild horses are tamed, the secret corners of the forest heavy with the scent of many men, and the view of the ripe hills blotted out by talking wires. Where is the thicket? Gone. Where is the eagle? Gone.

Monday, 29 November 2010

Book binding

These tutorials might be useful for your task:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUD0iKBkCVo&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UO-KYuC85sk&NR=1

Thinking about criticism...

Analizing the discussion we were having last class about peer review, I think that one of the reasons we have not been actively peer-reviewing other's texts is because we are too afraid to offend our classmates with any bad comment. To criticize, from my point of view, is really difficult; you have to take into account people's feelings and the way you are going to critique them without hurting or discouraging them. Considering this, you have to be a critical reader and part psychologist at the same time, being the latter is a harder work for most of us.

According to wikipipedia, -it might not be the best source- "Criticism is the judgement of the merits and faults of the work or actions of one individual by another (the critic). To criticise does not necessarily imply to find fault, but the word is often taken to mean the simple expression of prejudice or disapproval". I actually like this definition because it shows the two perspectives of the issue, which means that criticize is not only giving validation to somebody else's work, but also recognizing the weakness of it.

In this sense, I agree with those who think that saying always good things is going to help; it might be encouraging for people if they hear: "I'm really impressed by your text!", or "You did a great job!", or "Keep working like this, never change!", -or whatever other praising phrases we make up-. But at the same time, I strongly believe that pointing out the good things is not going to help at all to improve the bad or weak ones. For me, pointing out the faults, not only the merits, would be more productive to the improvement of our writing process or, more general, our learning process.

The problem I've faced by thinking this way, is that I focus too much my attention in the things that I don't like -even recognizing the good things- and I say what I really think about it without taking the psychologist position, being sometimes too honest and hard on them. With this strategy, I've found that people do not want to be told any unpleasant or disapproval comment and some of them take it as a personal attack. One of two things is happening: we are so reluctant to critique that we don't even know how to manage judgements or we don't know how to effectively address a critique to somebody. Either way, that's why most people -at least I do- prefer not to comment anything.

The hardest work for me , then, is to think about what people's feelings are; if they are too sensitive for my extreme -some would say brutal- honesty, or if they are just looking for a good comment, or even if they're going to hate me for not approving or agreeing with them. However, I don't consider feelings that much, on the contrary I do believe that the most productive critiques are those that hurt the most, because adults do not need to be cheered all the time.

This is only a reflection about why we should be more critical with the others if we really want to help them/us, it might be difficult to say some things or to accept some comments, but as long as we learn how to criticize and how to use the critiques to improve ourselves we are going to take the word "criticism" in a more possitive sense and we are going to be able to enjoy its advantages. I'm open to any kind of critique, so please do not hesitate to comment what do you think about it.

Wednesday, 24 November 2010

[sic]

Sic – generally inside square brackets, [sic], and occasionally parentheses, (sic) – when added just after a quote or reprinted text, indicates that the passage is just as it appears from its original source. The usual purpose is to inform readers that any errors or apparent errors in the copied material are not from transcription – i.e. that they are reproduced exactly from the original writer or printer. Bracketed sics have also been used in humorous comments and for ridicule, typically by drawing attention to the original writer's mistakes.

Tuesday, 23 November 2010

quiz literacies

some questions to think about

Why does “practice” signal a shift away from fetishizing culture, language, literacy and other social phenomena?

Think of a situation to illustrate what a literacy event is. Analyze how social identities are displayed in that situation.

Compare/Contrast the two definitions of discourse you find in the article. In which aspects are they similar? In which aspects are they different?

Discuss and exemplify the two meanings the expression “Being educated” has in the Brazilian context.

Do you consider that literacy shaming is a form of symbolic violence in Colombia? Establish a relation between the case of Brazil and our case.

Do you consider that minority groups are discriminated or ridiculed at the Universidad del Valle, Cali because of their patterns of speech and their degree of literacy? Explain your answer.

In the adult literacy education program reported in the article, there were students who didn't stop viewing themselves as social inferiors. What cultural artifacts could help them reach their goal of literacy equality?

Thursday, 18 November 2010

Information about Barbara Schneider
Taken from http://drdc.uchicago.edu/about/bios/schneider.html

Barbara Schneider is currently a professor of sociology and human development at the University of Chicago and will join the faculty at Michigan State University as the John A. Hannah Chair in the College of Education in the fall of 2005. She currently directs the Data Research and Development Center, and co-directs the Alfred P. Sloan Center on Parents, Children, and Work.

Interested in the lives of adolescents and their families and schools, Schneider has written widely on these topics. Her most recent publications include: The Ambitious Generation: America 's Teenagers, Motivated but Directionless, co-authored with David Stevenson, Yale University Press; Becoming Adult: How Teenagers Prepare for the World of Work, co-authored with Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Basic Books; and Trust in Schools, A Core Resource for Improvement, co-authored with Anthony Bryk, Russell Sage Foundation. She and Linda Waite have recently completed a book based on findings from the Sloan 500 Family Study exploring the lives of working families entitled Being Together, Working Apart: Dual-Career Families and the Work-Life Balance, Cambridge University Press. Schneider is currently conducting a new random assignment project, TEACH Research, that is designed to improve adolescents' transition to post secondary education.

Schneider serves on a number of advisory boards including the AERA Grants Board. Recently, she was selected by the American Sociological Association as the new editor of Sociology of Education.

Tuesday, 9 November 2010

My PWP

STILL FRAGMENTS

Some time ago I was asking myself how members of the Congress make for knowing what the people’s needs are, whether they are not exactly ordinary people; I mean, most of the population in Colombia are poor and these special citizens have all the opportunities for a life style with privileges. So, how can they understand what people live without their same opportunities? That is to say, Congress members usually are in the capital city, frequenting the best and more expensive places, with big cars and fine clothes; I guess their children go to elite schools and private universities, very often abroad. That is all ok considering that anyone has the right to live it up, but if you are working for the country and you know that poverty exists in every region, that there are kids begging on the streets, unemployed women head of family, homeless persons walking around, peasants without land to work and so on… thus where are these people’s rights left? They also wish to live it up, or at least have a modest life, with an assured meal three times a day, an assured school for their children, an assured job for going on and an assured medical assistance. How do members of the Congress help to those situations earning what they earn, moving around their privileged social circle and living the same comfortable experiences day after day?

Answer: They do not help enough. Just like everyone, I said “it’s not fair” and I kept on my way.
I know many people have thought something like this once in a while, but we also know deep inside ourselves that one alone cannot change the system, so we don't even try. We prefer not to expect anything from the Congress, politicians or the law, for the better.
However, there are moments, occasions in which some persons decide to agree on their need of acting and do not allow to die the opposition, the resistance to injustice and the voice of people who live and suffer but it is not heard. Or sometimes this voice can be heard, for instance during elections, when politicians are in small towns asking for votes, but after the results of those elections promises seem to be forgotten and you think: if they are who got the tools to change the life style of those people who vote for them why nothing gets better?
...


Last Friday, October 8 was the opening of The Congress of the Peoples in Bogotá; the idea was to create a mandate made by the people from the masses in which the community would legislate, would order the territory, the economy and the way to govern themselves.


The Congress was organized by axes, distributed in seven working tables according to the major concerns of the people, these were:

- Land, territory and sovereignty.
- Economy for living and against the dislodging.
- Nation building for a good living.
- Culture, diversity and shared ethics.
- Life, justice […] politics.
- Rights violation and unfulfilled agreements.
- People’s integration and globalization of fights.

Most of the crowd were indigenous communities, especially from the Colombian southwest, as we know, indigenous in Cauca are one of the best organized movements in the country; you could realize that they were strong promoters of the event.

Next to the indigenous communities there were afro communities, peasants, students, “mototaxistas”, LGBT community and people concerned with the event, as well as journalists following the sessions. But these journalists belonged to a sort of independent press, maybe to ONGs, because there was no presence of Caracol or RCN at all.

All the axes were based in severe problems which concern for people’s well-being and the idea was to find a solution together; changes will not be done immediately but at least persons must begin to look for them. The plan was to identify first how the region had contributed to the axis, then what to do in the face of those current troubles and finally how do the people can organize themselves.

Many situations emerged in common in the different axes. That is, every concept was connected to each other: the act of living implies to deal with justice, culture, territory, rights, and so on. In consequence, a variety of similar problems were mentioned on several occasions, such as the recuperation and release of the earth and its natural resources because of the importance in both the native conception of earth as a Mother and the need for preserving the means in existence for sustainability.

This was perhaps the strongest point remarked during the Congress: territory. “Land is neither for buying nor for sale, land is for liberating it and defending it”. That is the speech which constantly sounded around; indigenous people, peasants and population from rural areas have been the victims of forced displacing, by reason of armed movements or multinational companies, the first ones for drug trafficking and the second ones for exploitation of the environment. They reject both. These people feel forgotten and isolated because the government knows this but does not offer a fair solution, we can see that. There are hundreds of people on the streets begging for surviving. Citizens do not differentiate among drug addicts, wanderers or displaced persons, and that happens especially in the capital city, where the law provides them with a basic supply and lodging into cheap hostels, endowed with mats which are 1 centimeter thick.

.....

Rap News!! Wow!!

http://www.youtube.com/user/thejuicemedia

And this guy makes some excellent raps about the news!!
I know this is not literature based, but he does however use the power of words and is really clever in his concise mix of content and rhyme... enjoy! The Al Gore climate change rap is my favourite!!
Listening practice ahoy!!

LIAR LIAR!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQFwxw57NBI

Hey everyone! Sorry I havent corrected anything recently on the blog!
Ill see you all in class tomorrow morning!
Here is a short new music video describing some of the problems we are having in England with
our stupid conservative led coallition government! Good tune too!!